The nights are drawing in, there’s a chill in the air, and the kids are getting ready to go back to school — summer’s nearly over for another year.
Now’s the time to reflect on all those vacations, barbecues, and, err, internet-breaking viral marketing campaigns, that made Summer 2024 what it was.
That’s right: it’s time to look back on the so-called ‘Brat summer’ of 2024.
For those unfamiliar with the term, Brat is the sixth studio album by English singer Charli XCX, and thanks to its distinctive lime green cover, radio-bothering run of singles (and remixes featuring everyone from Lorde to Billie Eilish) and an enormous promotional push, it has felt like it’s been everywhere.
More than an album, for some people at least, Brat has become a way of living. To be at the tailend of a ‘Brat summer’ is to have spent the past few months partying, having fun, and, as Charli puts it, looking like an icon.
Brands lapped the whole thing up: everyone from Kate Spade to the cast of Twisters via Skims and Barnes & Noble bratified things on their social channels.
It wasn’t just brands who got involved: even Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris co-opted the Brat aesthetic for the early stages of her (still ongoing) election campaign. Which, let’s be honest, is a pretty big deal.
Using CintSnap – a way to survey individuals and understand opinions quickly – we conducted a poll with approximately 300 people in the UK and the US to uncover whether or not marketing campaigns always equal success for artists — and brands.
Of those who have spent time with the LP, listening to it via a streaming service is their preferred method of delivery for just under a fifth (18% of Brits, 17% of Americans) of our respondents.
It seems like ownership isn’t on the agenda for the bulk of people surveyed by Cint. For all the fanfare in recent years about the vinyl revival, only 10% of US respondents and 5% of Brits went to their local record shop to pick up the LP. CDs fared even worse: a tiny 7% of surveyors from both countries bought Brat in that format.
Not everyone we polled is so keen on the idea, though. In the UK, a third of respondents indicated that campaigns of this kind engender negative or very negative feelings, a figure that drops to 15% in the US.
It might have spawned a million memes, a TikTok dance trend, and could even sway a US presidential election, but our CintSnap is evidence that in the cutthroat world of music, going viral isn’t a surefire way of shifting units — or getting people to buy unrelated products.
Have you been bumpin’ that? Or avoiding the whole thing entirely? Join the conversation on our LinkedIn page.
Was it really a ‘Brat summer’?
While she might claim to be “your favorite reference”, Cint respondents seem somewhat cool on Charli and the concept of a ‘Brat summer’. Over half (52%) of our American respondents were either unaware or very unaware of the trend. Those numbers track nearly identically on the other side of the Atlantic, with 30% of Brits being very unaware of ‘Brat summer’, while 25% downgraded slightly to considering themselves unaware of the phenomenon. Asked if they’d had a Brat summer, the answer on both sides of the pond was a resounding no: 58% of UK respondents and 45% of those surveyed in the US were categorical about the fact that they haven’t had felt bratty over the past few months. In happier reading for Charli XCX and her record label, around a quarter of everyone we questioned (23% in the UK vs 25% in the US) considered themselves to have embodied the Brat mindset while the sun shined.Did it shift records?
OK, so not everyone went Full Brat, even if the album rollout might have been one of the summer’s biggest viral smashes. However, did it have a tangible impact on record sales? In a result that demonstrates that hype doesn’t always translate directly into commercial success, and if our survey is anything to go by, the answer is pretty straightforwardly no. 46% of US respondents (and 40% of those questioned in the UK) have not listened to Brat. In both nations, just over a fifth of those questioned by Cint (21%) have no intention of ever pressing play on the record. However, results were similar across the pond when polled if a huge marketing push backing a new song or album release would likely sway listening habits with a majority in the US (65%) and UK (64%) stating they would be very or somewhat likely to hit play.
Of those who have spent time with the LP, listening to it via a streaming service is their preferred method of delivery for just under a fifth (18% of Brits, 17% of Americans) of our respondents.
It seems like ownership isn’t on the agenda for the bulk of people surveyed by Cint. For all the fanfare in recent years about the vinyl revival, only 10% of US respondents and 5% of Brits went to their local record shop to pick up the LP. CDs fared even worse: a tiny 7% of surveyors from both countries bought Brat in that format.
Did it shift perceptions?
For Cint’s respondents, the buzz might not have correlated directly with getting hold of the album, but has external adoption done anything to their image of a particular brand or product? Asked how likely they were to have their perception of a brand changed by them jumping on a trend like ‘Brat summer’, our audience indicated that feelings are mixed. Just under half (42%) of Americans and a third of Brits (33%) were very positive or positive about brands leveraging major media trends.
Not everyone we polled is so keen on the idea, though. In the UK, a third of respondents indicated that campaigns of this kind engender negative or very negative feelings, a figure that drops to 15% in the US.
It might have spawned a million memes, a TikTok dance trend, and could even sway a US presidential election, but our CintSnap is evidence that in the cutthroat world of music, going viral isn’t a surefire way of shifting units — or getting people to buy unrelated products.
Have you been bumpin’ that? Or avoiding the whole thing entirely? Join the conversation on our LinkedIn page.
